- Alexandra Atseff, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone: Book to Film [blog]
- Aubrey Cunningham, Fantasy Fiction [blog]
- Halie Degnan, Alternate Worlds [web site]
- Paige Jones, Fairy Tale Seamstress [blog on making of fairy tale dress for character in her fairy tale revision of Beauty and the Beast]
- Jessica Krajacic and Skylar Pratt, Fantasy Fiction and the Harry Potter Generation [blog]
- Kyle Roof, Harry Potter vs. LotR vs. GoT--Fantasy Fiction Club [live-action on youtube]
- Rhiannon Vercant, A Neapolitan Cinderella in Oz [animation on vimeo]
- Ashley Weinheimer, History of Magic School [blog]
- Kristal Zarczynski, Fantasy Blog [blog]
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Fredonia's Got Talent!
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Questions about A Wizard of Earthsea, Fall 2014
World-Based
- Why so much emphasis on all the names (of people and places) in the book? Do they have importance later on?
- How powerful is the concept of a true name? What are its limits in shaping the lives of the characters?
- What is a deciding factor in who is magical and who is not?
- Why do wizards always learn in secret?
- By adding a number of different wizard-like figures in the novel, does the magic of Earthsea become more structured--or more chaotic and complex?
- Why is Earthsea made to be so complicated that we as readers cannot define most of the concepts/map out the world ourselves?
- As an introduction to a long series does A Wizard of Earthsea do the world justice?
- Gender and differing magic roles? Evil magic=female? Lack of female magicians and powerful females in general throughout multiple series?
- Why do characters' names have to be changed, and why can't they tell anybody their real name? What is the significance?
- I felt that the writing style/plot of this novel was too obvious (at least so far). The "fork in the road" moments are almost cut and dry decisions. When Ged chooses to go to school, it was almost too easy to guess where he was going to end up. Is this supposed to be a commentary on how hindsight is 20/20 or is it just poorly written?
- What would books be without a main conflict?
- Why did the author decide to have only men be wizards?
- Is the sexism presented purposely done as a foreshadowing or is it just sexism?
- Do you think getting feminist attention was part of Le Guin's intention?
- Vetch is described as dark-skinned, gluttonous, and sort of a comic relief. This novel was written around the '60s; it was very common in this time for black characters in books and other sources of media to be seen in this light. Was it groundbreaking that Le Guin incorporated a powerful wizard who is black or just being stereotypical?
- Is good versus evil what makes the story more interesting for the reader?
- What is the significance of a person's identity?
- A Wizard of Earthsea is clearly the most Tolkien-esque book we've read, outside, of course, The Hobbit. The emphasis is on the world. I couldn't bring myself to care about what was going on because the story wasn't that unique and the author seems to care precious little about the actual writing side of the book. The narration is very passive and flat...I don't want to be mean, but I couldn't understand the appeal of this one...but I don't think I'm much of a fantasy fan in general...?
- Did this book get a lot of feminist attention?
- Was this book the first popular one of its kind to involve a wizard/magic academy?
- Why is there a focus on names in fantasy fiction? What is the power of names/naming?
- In T.H. White's The Once and Future King, ordinary Wart becomes legendary Arthur when he pulls Excalibur out of the Stone. Does this name/identity change have any influence on the change from Duny to Ged? What is the significance of name changes in fantasy?
- Is good/evil a common theme in fantasy fiction writing? What about other genres? I'm beginning to question if this is a theme in all books.
- It seems like the further along in time we get, the less pure the protagonist is, and the less black and white good and evil are. I like that he is a victim to things like ambition and pride because it makes him more believable and more likable. Compared to fantasy novels of the past, has there been a definite shift in the moral standing of the character the reader is meant to see as the hero in more recent books? Is what I noticed a real trend, or just a coincidence?
- In most of the novels we've read. the main character has been orphaned in some way and in A Wizard of Earthsea it's no different. Why is this a recurring aspect of fantasy fiction? What effect does this give the story that the authors are trying to achieve?
- I watched the movie version of Earthsea directed by Goro Miyazaki and I realized that Ged's personality is the movie was so much different than in the book. What made this so?
- Women's magic seems to be scorned in Earthsea whereas a sorcerer would be respected. The same goes for The Hobbit: how many female sorcerers or magic users are there? And when there is a female magic user (Galadriel), is she respected or fared? Why the lack of female protagonists in fantasy fiction about magic users?
- Most stories we've read make animals very important (eagles, Narnians, daemons); in this novel, Ged has a connection to birds and adopts a flying squirrel. Does this lead to a bigger connection in the end, or are animals used more or less as an example of his magical ability?
Questions about The Hobbit, Fall 2014
- How long did the quest take? How much time had passed when Bilbo returns to The Shire? About a year or so?
- Why is it in every fantasy story they have to cross the continent to the farthest geographical point possible?
- Why is Middle Earth the staple for fantasy?
- Why did Bilbo take the Arkenstone?
- How long was Bilbo knocked out when he gets hit in the head by the rock (after the eagles)?
- Why does Bilbo take so long to share with his friends about the ring? What did he think was going to happen if he told people when he first got it?
- After Bilbo's encounter with Gollum in the cave, asking riddles in the dark, why did he not tell Gandalf about where he was after he reunited with the group? Is it because the ring compelled him not to?
- Why is Bilbo unharmed by the ring's usage? Why does Sauron not send for him? And, furthermore, how is Bilbo not weakened and maddened by the ring as many other characters in Middle Earth are?
- Why is the Ring portrayed so much more positively in The Hobbit than in The Lord of the Rings?
- Bilbo Baggins never seems to be heroic on purpose; everything that happens to him seems to happen on accident, at least early in the novel: is this because fate is just playing out, meaning Bilbo really was destined to be on this journey, as Gandalf said, or because Bilbo is not a hero?
- Why was Bilbo so content with going home and "not being in great danger ever again"? The adventure was the greatest experience he would ever be a part of, so why not go with Gandalf and adventure more? Seems so much better than staying at home.
- What drives Bilbo's sense of adventure and his ability to face such danger he is so unaccustomed to?
- How do Bilbo's internal emotions relate to the other characters within the story?
- Do we see characters switching roles throughout the story, and how so?
- What is the significance of the characters switching roles?
- To what degree can a family heritage affect the quests of Tolkien's characters?
- In the second half of The Hobbit, a good amount of action occurs, but the small amount of Smaug is honestly surprising to me. As one of the main anti-heroes of the story you would expect to see a lot more of him or at least of his story. So my question is, was Smaug the true villain of the story? I don't believe so. I believe "the darkness" is what is evil, whether it be the dark forests and spiders or the Necromancer.
- Who is the Necromancer? Is he a Witch King? Is he the main antagonist? Or is that Smaug?
- Why did wizard stuff take place off-stage?
- Why are necromancers so underrated?
- What idiot told the Goblins Smaug was dead?
- Why did the Lake Men destroy the bridge when their foe was in the sky?
- Why didn't they just take the eagles?
- I question the use of the upbeat, cheerful narrator that we talked about last time. Why choose to do this? Why not a darker narrator?
- Why did the narrator change perspectives so many times?
- Why didn't Tolkien give each dwarf their own identity and distinguish them from one another?
- Why would the author choose to use 13 dwarves? It seems like they are not all necessary to the story.
- In a world full of so many epic tales (the Kinslaying, the Fall of Beleriand, the wars against Morgoth, the fall of Numenor, etc.) why did J.R.R. Tolkien write The Hobbit as his first publication of Middle Earth?
- In the novel, during the epic battle scene (Battle of the Five Armies), Tolkien leaves out many of the details and decides to retell them after the war. Why does he follow Bilbo's perspective instead of a general and large-scaled view? And why does he knock Bilbo out?
- Was The Hobbit an extension of Tolkien's mythology for Britain?
- How far had the story of The Lord of the Rings been developed when Tolkien was writing The Hobbit?
- In The Hobbit the one ring isn't really implied to be evil. It seems to just be a cool magic item to set Bilbo apart. It doesn't seem to corrupt Bilbo like it does in later stories. So how much of the world/plot of the Lord of the Rings trilogy do you think Tolkien had planned when he wrote The Hobbit? Do you think that he knew the significance of Bilbo's ring when he wrote The Hobbit, or was this something he added to the trilogy, to tie it into something from the original story?
- One question I had was about the Necromancer plot point. Did it really get solved off-screen, with no help from Bilbo? Was Tolkien just trying to tie up loose ends or was it really that simple to introduce then complete a plot-point off-screen?
- After seeing how quickly Thorin is accepted by the humans in River Town, it became clear to me that birthright and names go a long way in Middle Earth. This is reinforced by the power of the Took name affecting Bilbo. In Tolkien's timeline and history of Middle Earth, does he have an established family tree of sorts for these prestigious names?
- People often suggest that The Lord of the Rings is an allegory for something (WW I or WW II, for example), even though Tolkien hated allegory. I wonder, then, what The Hobbit's allegory could be?
- Why does Tolkien neglect any diversity in gender in his characters?
- Why do they change the movie so much from the book? I know that action movies make more money, but it seems like a disservice to Tolkien and the novel.
- Why did the movie director create the movie? What point of view was he attracted to?
Saturday, September 20, 2014
Questions about Fantasy Fiction, Fall 2014
General Questions About Fantasy Fiction
Formalist
- What is the most important element in a work of fantasy?
- Does fantasy fiction take longer to set up because you have to explain the world, the characters, etc.?
- How does the story move along?
- Is the phrase "No book is original" from How to Read Literature Like a Professor actually true or not?
- What actually makes something fantasy fiction?
- What are some of the structures and conventions of fantasy fiction?
- Where do many of the concepts and ideas of fantasy fiction come from?
- What are the most important elements that define a work of fantasy fiction?
- Can a story be considered fantasy if it does not include magic?
- Are heroes and villains necessary for a story to be considered fantasy?
- How do the main characters in fantasy novels relate to each other? What makes some of these characters heroes?
- If all fantasy novels were compared using the hero formula (separation/initiation/return), would they all relate?
- Is there a difference between male and female heroes?
- What novels outside of the class could be considered fantasy fiction?
- Can short stories be considered fantasy fiction?
- Are there fantasy plays and poems, or are they all novels, tales, and prose?
- Does there have to be a form of "magic" to make it a fantasy?
- Do fantasy books tend to stay within the confines of "old earth but with magic and monsters"? Is that part of what fantasy is?
- What "types" of fantasy fiction are there?
- What types of fantasy worlds (portal/secondary/alternate history) have been invented?
- Do the best works of fantasy need their own universes (Wonderland, Middle Earth, Fairyland, Oz, Westeros and Essos, Narnia, etc.) or do/can great works of fantasy take place in the world we know? Does good fantasy require world-building?
- What is the range of fantasy fiction?
- What are the limitations of fantasy fiction?
- Is fantasy fiction limited to only specific conventions, tropes, and other stereotypical scenarios?
- How widespread is fantasy fiction and what makes it so different from the rest of the world?
- Is there a distinction between fantasy and broader unrealistic fiction?
- Is there any work or subgenre that could be argued as realistic fantasy fiction?
- What makes fantasy fiction different from other forms of fiction? What dictates it to be fantasy?
- Where is the line between fairy tales and fantasy fiction?
- Where is the line drawn between fantasy fiction and science fiction?
- How well can fantasy fiction and science fiction mesh together? Must they reject each other?
- Could magical realism and fantasy ever be combined or connected?
- Can't all genre fiction fit into the fantasy fiction genre?
- Is there such a thing as mainstream fantasy (e.g., Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter) and, if so, how is it different from non-mainstream fantasy?
- Does fantasy translate better from book to film than any other literary genre? If so, why? If not, why not?
- How progressive can fantasy fiction be?
- Why haven't I received my Hogwarts letter yet?
- What is it about magic that is so appealing?
- Will we learn a lot from the readings, both intellectually and emotionally?
- It is said that any fantasy stories are good for children's education--what aspects of these stories affect them or appeal to them?
- How does fantasy fiction keep the reader interested?
- While reading should one take into account the time and culture during which the piece was written, even if one is supposed to be engulfed in "the fantasy"?
- What do you expect of a fantasy novel to consider it "good"?
- Do I truly enjoy fantasy fiction or are Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings just the best out there?
- Should these works be taken on their own merit or must we analyze what symbolism and other devices are used to make commentary on the real world? Does this analysis ruin the magic?
- How far detached from "real life" is it safe to become while reading these works?
- How can we compare the worlds of fantasy with the worlds of religions? More specifically, how readers and followers truly believe that maybe someday they will get a Hogwarts letter, or that if they worship a certain god, they'll achieve a paradise after life?
- Why do some people prefer fantasy fiction over science fiction, and vice versa?
- Why is fantasy socially acceptable?
- The resurgence of fantasy (books, tv shows, movies) in popular culture is due to what, exactly (economic issues, social issues, etc.)?
- Is it fair to say that fantasy is the most popular literary genre today? If so, why?
- Does escapism have anything to do with the current wave of fantasy fiction fans?
- Would fantasy fiction be as popular or socially acceptable if most of these books weren't adapted to successful motion pictures/television series?
- How does censorship and pop culture come into how fantasy books are adapted into film?
- Some fantasy novels or series have been adapted into films that are either less adult (Eragon) or more adult (The Hobbit) than the audiences for which they were originally written. Why?
- How have fantasy fiction affected audiences all over the world?
- Why are so many people involved in reading fantasy fiction?
- Where do you believe fantasy fiction is headed?
- How do the expectations of society impact the fantasy genre?
- Where do many of the concepts and ideas of fantasy fiction come from?
- How can fantasy fiction apply to the real world?
- How do characters in fantasy relate to us in real life?
- Can fantasy fiction really be considered plausible?
- Literature can be read as a whole bunch of allusions/symbols meaning something different that the literal text, so are fantasy "worlds" literary devices or meant to be believed as truth?
- Can fantasy still have morals and points? Do all fantasy works have them?
- Does fantasy always examine morality?
- Does good fantasy always need to tackle moral issues?
- Does religion play a huge role in these novels, and why?
- How progressive can fantasy fiction be?
- Why is there such a male dominance as role characters in fantasy fiction? (Even though there is a slight rise in female lead characters, it still seems the male protagonist is the dominating role.)
- Why different worlds?
- Dreams vs. reality vs. magic realms: what defines the difference between them? is it subjective?
- What do dreams tell about a dreamer? Do they have meaning?
- What is life? Is it real, or an invention of someone?
- What is real?
- Why do fantasy fiction authors use their initials in their names?
- Would all the authors of the works we're going to be reading consider their writing fantasy fiction?
- Where do many of the concepts and ideas of fantasy fiction come from?
- Is "escaping" a popular reason why fantasy fiction is continually being written?
- How do authors refine a story from ideas of monsters and magic into fantasy fiction?
- How do authors make up a world? Is it all imagination or influences from other stories, real life, etc.?
- Do fantasy writers translate what is happening in their world into their novels?
- In a lot of fantasy fiction there is this battle of good vs. evil that tends to repeat itself, so does the time period influence the writer into setting the storyline in a war-immersed setting? (For example, Tolkien influenced by WW I...)
- Are there any great fantasy fictions influenced by the colonial era?
- What is the history of fantasy fiction?
- How old is fantasy fiction? How did it begin?
- Is fantasy just a continuation of mythology?
- Were the origins of fantasy based more in medieval times or that of fairy tales?
- Why is fantasy fiction more often based in the medieval era instead of modern times?
- Does fantasy fiction share elements of Enlightenment, Romantic, and/or Victorian fiction?
- When did fantasy fiction become mainstream? Which books/series started the fad for fantasy films?
- When was the transition when fantasy fiction became pop culture?
- Do you think the large focus on fantasy has to do with the rise of gaming and video games in the last 30-40 years?
- How does fantasy fiction evolve between writers?
- What have various fantasy writers done to make their work stand out/expand upon the fantasy genre?
- How progressive can fantasy fiction be?
- What has Disney done to the original stories that now seem to be forgotten compared to their Disney movie versions?
- J.R.R. Tolkien has been referred to as the "father of fantasy"--is this a fair statement, and if so, why?
- How have other authors responded to C.S. Lewis's works?
- What were some of the biggest influences on the most prominent of recent fantasy writers (J.K. Rowling, George R.R. Martin, etc.)?
- How visible is George R.R. Martin's science fiction background in Game of Thrones?
- Can you combine science fiction and fantasy fiction?
- How does one go about writing fantasy fiction?
Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass Questions
- How is a raven like a writing desk?
- The baby turned into a piglet? Why? How?
- Is Wonderland a different view of our world or a new world?
- Was all of Wonderland just a dream or actually real because Alice believed it to be?
- How does Wonderland work? What are the rules of its universe? Can you even have a world when the laws of existence seem fluid at best and everyone is a raving lunatic? Can you ever have meaningful change without consistency? Is Wonderland just forever stagnant and repetitive? Are all the characters stuck in this mad loop forever? Are they all so mad as to stay on their one-track moebius strips?
- Wonderland is obviously a legitimate fantasy world--why else would it have a name? (I guess I'm just intrigued by the logistics of a fantasy world that is fundamentally nonsensical.)
- How does Wonderland relate to other fictional realms/worlds/universes? Particularly with respect to concepts of time...?
- After Wonderland, it will be interesting to see how different novel "universes" respond to rules/chaos--more or less structured? How does it matter to each plot? Defining factors of each?
- Do each of the characters control time through their own perception?
- Does the food chain apply in Wonderland? Is there any kind of animal hierarchy?
- Why do all the problems that occur in Wonderland seem to get solved almost instantaneously?
- Is this really a dream? Whose dream? Is everything a dream?
- What would great thinkers like Plato think about Alice?
- How old is Alice supposed to be?
- What is actually happening to Alice in Through the Looking-Glass? Is she wandering through her estate, talking to flowers?
- Doesn't it seem strange how quickly Alice abandons her life in the real world?
- Did Alice have some kind of disorder? Or is she just an imaginative child? If she does have a personality disorder, how can she recognize, as a child, differences between her and people in her life? Was this child a very imaginative and open-minded person, or does she suffer from any disorders such as multiple personality, schizophrenia, or depression that allows her to accept her fates?
- Is Alice's main issue with identity or growing up?
- What made Alice have this wild dream—the book her sister was reading, her imagination, or what?
- How does Alice perceive reality if she keeps living and learning in dreams? What is Alice's reality?
- How is Alice so smart and resourceful for a child? Is she an important person's daughter to be so educated and opinionated?
- Was there any inconsistency with her cleverness and lack of it?
- Would you classify Alice as a heroine or a ditzy child?
- Do you think Alice is strange or does she act the way a typical child does?
- Alice never really freaks out about the fact that she's in another dimension and hardly questions the talking animals or disappearing cats with grins. Does her acceptance make her more delightful or somehow frustrating?
- Why is Alice an effective character, one who experiences such bizarre circumstances with mostly comfort and ease?
- Why does Alice focus so much on being crazy? Is she questioning her own sanity? Or everyone else's?
- Is Alice actually mad or does being in Wonderland make her mad?
- How is Alice choosing who/what to believe in Wonderland?
- Why does Alice start to forget things (rhymes, things she's learned in school, etc.)?
- If I were Alice the story would not go smoothly because I have no courage to walk forward. What characteristics made Alice get through Wonderland?
- I feel like Alice should have been scared, especially around the queen. But her fear was mild, and that was disconcerting. To her, in the space of time, everything that happened was real. Was she not afraid of being stuck there?
- Why does Alice spend most of her time avoiding drama?
- Were the characters simply there to get Alice thinking?
- Was Alice supposed to have learned a lesson from all the events that happened in Wonderland?
- Do things going on in the magical world have something to do with her real life?
- Were Alice's sister's similar experiences of Wonderland while sleeping significant at all?
- Does the story have any meaning? (It seems to have no direction.) How do you find any significance in a book like this? What is the point of the novel? (It all seems like nonsense to me.)
- Why does the story go around in circles?
- Is the narrator unreliable? Can you have an unreliable narrator?
- Was Alice in Wonderland a political allegory or satire?
- Who/what is Alice supposed to represent?
- Does Alice's view of the world represent that of a young girl or does it refer to an ignorant, unchanging adult?
- Is Alice's adventure of going down the rabbit-hole a metaphor for something else?
- When Alice is "drowning in her own tears," could it be a metaphor for depression?
- Do some of these characters directly correlate to an aspect of Alice's life/struggles? Do they function as metaphors or personifications? What do they represent or symbolize? Are the characters symbolic of pure nonsense?
- Was there any sort of significance as to why Alice kept changing sizes?
- What metaphors are there to real life/society in the novels, if any, and how can we identify them?
- Is there any allegory for the focus on playing cards and chess?
- Why do all the characters seem to have such an absurd attitude? What was the significance of all these odd characters? What did they symbolize?
- Are there antagonists? (The Queen is likely the best example, but when it comes to those giving Alice a hard time, there is certainly no shortage.)
- Are the animals used as a form of symbolism? Why are they all small animals?
- Could the animals represent the adults in Alice's life?
- What is the significance of it being a rabbit that Alice follows, the creature that leads Alice to Wonderland?
- What can birds represent in the novel? Is Alice's experience with the birds supposed to be an analogy of sorts for multiculturalism and stepping into an unfamiliar culture?
- Why does the caterpillar smoke if this is a children's book? Does this start controversy?
- Because the novel ends with Alice discovering it was all a dream, do you believe it made her entire journey of shrinking and growing, arguing, and such irrelevant?
- What happens after?!
- Do the novels actually have nothing to do with the real world or logic? Is it simply meant to be a dream-like sequence? Can it be as much about daydreaming, making believe, and pretending as dreaming?
- Is there a real-world connection?
- What does this book reveal about its time and our time?
- Is there a connection to morality or reason?
- What defines nonsense? What is real if you are gifted with an imagination?
- What is madness? Is it anything that strays from conventional logic? Is it an objective state, or dependent on the person?
- What if this were how children actually feel and think of things in their everyday life? How can we say it's madness when children can't accurately convey how they feel and think?
- Who controls language? Decides what is acceptable?
- Does any part of the story have something to do with what was going on in Lewis Carroll's world at the time he wrote it?
- Is this a statement of her individual self-realization or a statement on Victorian society?
- Is the story tackling more than one issue, or is it more of an overview of the Victorian era? (cf. caucus race, potions and cakes, executions...)
- Are these works an exception to the rule that rules/laws and consistent, logical, structured world-building are necessary to create really good fantasy fiction? Why do the Alice stories work with so few rules/laws, but Game of Thrones and Harry Potter need so many to flourish?
- Was the book considered fast-paced for its time?
- Who was the target audience of Alice in Wonderland? Is this supposed to be geared for children or adults? Or trying to entertain both at the same time?
- What prompted Carroll to write these novels? What was his motivation? Why did he set out to write such a dream-like, non-sensical story? Was it intended to be an allegory at all?
- Should Carroll's relationship with Alice define the books?
- How did Carroll get inspiration for the scenes in the novels?
- With the education scenes with the Gryphon and Mock Turtle, was Carroll making fun of a specific educational system?
- Could Carroll have been using nonsense to attack some math ideas, challenging the validity of ideas by testing its premises and taking them to their logical extremes?
- Why Wonderland? Why involve a little girl in a world of talking animals and nonsense? Is it to contrast with conventional education? To challenge traditional logic and deduction? Why does Alice become a voice of reason to many characters?
- Is the use of nonsense a way to bring back the confusion of childhood, or a manner of questioning reality and the universe?
- Does Carroll understand the use of a transition? How can he expect flow?
- Besides the beginning and end I felt like the middle didn't have an inherent order and scenes changed sort of rapidly. Was this on purpose? Did the author have a reason for having events play out in the way they did?
- Did Carroll think of Alice as a sympathetic character?
- Why did the author constantly manipulate Alice's knowledge?
- What drugs was Carroll on?
- Why is this story still so popular?
- How did Carroll leave readers with such a lasting impression of characters after introducing most only once or twice in a seemingly orderless universe? Is it their pure creative nature that is memorable, or perhaps the unique personality of each and how they antagonize Alice?
- If you were in Wonderland, which character would you trust most and why?
- What can/should we as readers do with the themes of dreaming and reality in Carroll's novels?
- Is Wonderland supposed to make the reader mad?
- How do we relate Alice in Wonderland to our lives?
- Wonderland makes us think a child's favorite question: why?
- Do the black-and-white drawings add anything to the book?
- Why are the film adaptations so morbid for a book that, I felt, was entirely light-hearted and whimsical?
- Why does Tim Burton's film adaptation include so much lead-up to Alice following the rabbit to Wonderland?
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Neal on Neil and Neal
Here's how I've been pitching it on campus.
ENGL 427 Major Writers: Neil Gaiman and Neal Stephenson
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Fantasy as Chick Lit?
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Questioning Fantasy: A Guide to My Students' Response Essays from ENGL 299
BOUNDARIES OF FANTASY
Defining Fantasy
- What is fantasy? Samantha Brethel, Alexe Brode, Steve Grzybowski, Derek Herzog, Christy Hewitt, Luke Hider, George M., Victoria Rader, Casey Takacs, Steph Ward
- How ought fantasy to be defined? Steve Grzybowski, Luke Hider, George M., Victoria Rader, Casey Takacs
- What characteristics/features must a work have--what conventions must it adhere to or expectations meet--to be considered fantasy? Samantha Brethel, Derek Herzog, Christy Hewitt, Luke Hider, Victoria Rader
- What's the "recipe" for fantasy? Victoria Rader
- Do the plots make up the genre or is it more on the style of writing chosen that makes a work belong in the fantasy genre? Derek Herzog
- Does there have to be some sort of supernatural element for it to be considered fantasy? Samantha Brethel, Steve Grzybowski, Luke Hider, George M., Victoria Rader
- How do we define the difference between the ordinary and fantastical? Christy Hewitt, Victoria Rader, Steph Ward
- When is something not considered to be fantasy? George M.
- How inclusive/exclusive should our definition be and how rigid/flexible should we be in applying it? Steve Grzybowski, Luke Hider, George M., Victoria Rader, Steph Ward
- Is the genre of fantasy subjective? Alexe Brode, George M., Casey Takacs, Steph Ward
Fantasy's Varieties, Relatives, and Neighbors
- What kinds of fantasy are there (sub-genres)?
- How does fantasy relate to science fiction, horror, myth, epic, romance, magical realism, and so on? Samantha Brethel, Alexe Brode, Steve Grzybowski, Christy Hewitt, George M., Victoria Rader, Lizzie Reid, Zain Syed, Steph Ward
- What is the line between fantasy fiction and genres like horror and sci-fi? Can this line be blurred? Samantha Brethel, Alexe Brode, Steve Grzybowski, Christy Hewitt, George M., Victoria Rader, Steph Ward
- Why do so many border disputes arise and what's at stake in specific ones? Casey Takacs, Steph Ward
Origins and Development of Fantasy
- When did fantasy start?
- What author embodies the start of the genre fantasy fiction?
- What distinguishes fantasy per se from its predecessors, influences, and so on?
- How did fantasy develop?
- What are the key turning points or transformations in the history of fantasy?
- Will fantasy, as a genre, ever die out or become dated?
- Do genres have life cycles?
VALUE(S) OF FANTASY
Quality of/in Fantasy
- How is quality measured in fantasy books? Gabrielle Fletcher, Kayleigh Witkowski, Erica Yunghans
- Who are the best fantasy writers and why?
- How do they stack up to the best writers in other genres?
- What exactly distinguishes "good fantasy" from "bad fantasy"? Gabrielle Fletcher, Adam Glasier
- What attributes make up a great fantasy fiction story?
- What medium is fantasy best suited for (if any), and why?
- Why is fantasy on the lower/lowest rung of the literature ladder? Matt Pisarski
- Who decided that plays written in the Renaissance are much better and for the intellectually elite than a novel about witches and dragons? Is it because the prose used is generally more simple? Is it because the plots are "different"?
- How does fantasy stack up against other genres? Brittany, Zain Syed
- What are the stereotypes/preconceived notions pertaining to fantasy fiction? Brittany, Kristian Everett, Derek Herzog, Matt Pisarski, Audrey Putney, Zain Syed, Casey Takacs
- Is fantasy necessarily regressive, nostalgic, conservative, reactionary, irrational, escapist...? Christine Botham, Kayla Carucci, Kristian Everett, Derek Herzog, Christy Hewitt, Matt Pisarski, Audrey Putney
- How do readers of fantasy get around the stigma that comes with the genre? Brittany, Derek Herzog, Matt Pisarski
Fantasy's Functions, Purposes, Uses
- Why does fantasy fiction exist? Lizzie Reid
- What is fantasy good for (if anything)? anonymous, Mike Bayba, Christine Botham, Kayla Carucci, C. Dunn, Eli, Eric Ellison, Kristian Everett, Christy Hewitt, Josh Jerome, Matt Pisarski, Audrey Putney, Lizzie Reid, Zain Syed, Casey Takacs, Kayleigh Witkowski, Tiffany Wood
- What is the purpose or role of fantasy in our culture? anonymous, Christine Botham, Kayla Carucci, Eli, Eric Ellison, Kristian Everett, Matt Pisarski, Audrey Putney, Lizzie Reid, Casey Takacs, Tiffany Wood
- What functions, uses, stakes might fantasy have for authors, readers, critics, institutions, society at large? anonymous, Mike Bayba, Christine Botham, Kayla Carucci, C. Dunn, Eli, Eric Ellison, Kristian Everett, Christy Hewitt, Josh Jerome, Hannah Morris, Matt Pisarski, Audrey Putney, Lizzie Reid, Zain Syed, Casey Takacs, Kayleigh Witkowski, Tiffany Wood, Erica Yunghans
- How have early fantasy writers affected today's society? C. Dunn
- What do responses to and debates over fantasy reveal (about society, present or past, at large or in particular groups or institutions)? Erica Yunghans
- Why do writers choose the genre of fantasy fiction? Eli, Eric Ellison, Adam Glasier, Lizzie Reid
- Is fantasy fiction meant merely as a means of entertainment or is it meant to be something deeper? anonymous, Mike Bayba, Christine Botham, Kayla Carucci, Eli, Eric Ellison, Kristian Everett, Josh Jerome, Hannah Morris, Matt Pisarski, Audrey Putney, Lizzie Reid, Zain Syed, Casey Takacs, Kayleigh Witkowski, Tiffany Wood, Erica Yunghans
- Can fantasy fiction be used as a platform for political, social, or cultural statements? Eli, Eric Ellison, Kristian Everett, Hannah Morris, Matt Pisarski, Audrey Putney, Erica Yunghans
- What messages are authors of fantasy fiction trying to convey? anonymous, Mike Bayba, Eli, Eric Ellison, Kristian Everett, Hannah Morris, Erica Yunghans
- What messages/attributes are typically included in fantasy books? For example, do they often include philosophical elements? anonymous, Mike Bayba, Eli, Eric Ellison, Josh Jerome, Matt Pisarski
- What is fantasy fiction able to teach us? anonymous, Mike Bayba, Christine Botham, Kayla Carucci, Hannah Morris, Matt Pisarski, Audrey Putney, Kayleigh Witkowski
- Why are some of the key conventions of fantasy (world-building, good vs. evil, quest, coming of age, rise and fall of civilizations) so enduringly popular? anonymous, Kayla Carucci, Tiffany Wood
- Why do we retell previous stories through fantasy? Lizzie Reid
Studying Fantasy
- What is the state of the art in fantasy criticism?
- What value can scholarly study of fantasy bring to the university, to the industry, to fan communities, to regular readers? Matt Pisarski
- How is the study of fantasy fiction viewed?
- What can scholars learn about fantasy from those outside academia?
- Are we really learning anything relevant by studying fantasy fiction? anonymous, Mike Bayba, Christine Botham, Kayla Carucci, Eli, Eric Ellison, Kristian Everett, Gabrielle Fletcher, Josh Jerome, Matt Pisarski, Audrey Putney, Casey Takacs, Kayleigh Witkowski, Tiffany Wood
HOW FANTASY WORKS
- Is magic in fantasy analogous to science/technology in science fiction?
- What role does religion play in the writing of fantasy fiction? Mike Bayba, Josh Jerome, Hannah Morris, Casey Takacs, Steph Ward, Erica Yunghans
- Are modern authors as heavily influenced by religion as Tolkien and Lewis were? If not, is that a product of our times? If yes, could it be argued that since so many were influenced by Tolkien and Lewis as forerunners of the genre, who were themselves heavily influenced by religion, modern authors are just as heavily influenced by religion, whether they realize it or not?
- Why is identity (especially the quest for one's identity) one of the most common themes in fantasy fiction? anonymous, Kayla Carucci, Josh Jerome, Tiffany Wood
- How do fantasy fiction stories relate to their time period and culture? Kristian Everett, George M., Hannah Morris, Matt Pisarski, Erica Yunghans
- How many new ideas and stories can a fantasy author come up with, without repeating a story?
- There are only so many mythological creatures, and it seems like the good v. evil story is getting redundant. How do fantasy writers stay original? Gabrielle Fletcher
- What is the process of writing a fantasy fiction novel? How much time and commitment goes into fabricating a new world? Adam Glasier, Tiffany Wood
Monday, December 20, 2010
What Is Fantasy Good For?
Throughout my literary education I never read Fantasy until this class in college. The subject always seemed non-essential to me, since it was not important enough to be taught in the classroom. Teachers always regarded Fantasy as a genre you read for fun or your own enjoyment. This approach to Fantasy that I learned through my teachers made me think that Fantasy was worthless and held no importance in the literary world. Upon completing the novel The True Game by Sheri Tepper, I have come to disagree with my former teachers. I think fantasy, in particular Tepper's novel, offers many valuable attributes and life lessons that would be perfect for an English classroom.
Within the English education major, you read a countless number of books in hopes to integrate them within your own classroom someday. I was aware of some of the more publicized versions of fantasy for adolescents such as The Giver and Harry Potter; however, many other fantasy novels, including Tepper's, were foreign to me. The criteria that many teachers look for when selecting books is on the basis of critical thinking, multiculturalism, morals or life lessons, and literary elements. In the few fantasy fiction books that I have read, I have noticed accounts of all these criteria. So why shouldn't fantasy be used in the classroom?
Tepper's novel The True Game offers its readers a story of morals, identity, and self-discovery through the main character Peter. Peter is on a quest throughout the novel to find his talent within his world. I believe many students will be able to find Peter very relatable and be able to make their own life connections to the story. There are some similarities between Tepper's novel and Rowling's Harry Potter, since both stories revolve around a young man searching for his identity within magical worlds. However, there is a central difference between the two novels in terms of narrative point of view. Within Tepper's novel, Peter tells the story as if he is talking to someone from his own world. This narrative technique causes the reader to construct Peter's world on their own through the dialogue and small hints the characters provide.
Within Tepper's novel Peter lives in another world from ours and is preparing for when he enters "The True Game." Due to the multidimensional setting of the novel, students have room for critical analysis and deconstruction of the two worlds, and comparison to our own. The True Game is a book for the creative imagination that provides the reader with a page-turning experience to discover what Peter's talent is and how his world works. Also, many students probably have not had the exposure to fantasy fiction within school; thus, the immersion of a new genre in their individual literary understanding could be beneficial. I have no doubt that Tepper's writing style and story of Peter will keep students engaged while reading it.
Within fantasy literature the idea of the 'real' is prominent. Presenting this genre to students can help them to speculate what is 'real' in literature as well as develop their own understanding of the issue. This discussion could also sidetrack into the topic of realism within literature and open up to novels such as The Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane. Fantasy Literature also opens the door to creative thinking/writing within a student, and provides them with great examples of beautiful figurative language and literary techniques. Also, in regards to assessment within a classroom, students could opt for creative or aesthetic responses, such as re-writing the ending or creating a film.
Fantasy fiction does hold many positive attributes to a classroom. Tepper's novel, as well as many others, fit the criteria of a good book to provide to students. There are many activities and learning experiences that can be gained from incorporating Fantasy in the classroom. I think one answer to the question "What is Fantasy good for (if anything)?" is that fantasy would be good for education.
"Serious Discussions of Identity? In a Fantasy Novel?!"
Detractors of the fantasy genre are quick to call it escapism, indulgent nostalgia, or any number of terms that amount to it being an insubstantial art with little meaning or value. While it's true that some fantasy is utter pulp fiction, there are many works within the genre that tackle real-world issues in ways that only fantasy can. An excellent example of a substantial fantasy novel is Good Omens by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett. The book is a satirical take on the Apocalypse, with numerous angels and demons all working towards the ultimate battle between Heaven and Hell. The three principal characters--the angel Aziraphale, the demon Crowley, and the Antichrist Adam--are all examples of conflicting identities. According to the Great Plan of which John wrote in Revelations, all three of them are meant to be instrumental in bringing about Armageddon. The only problem is, they happen to like the world, and ending it would just ruin all their days.
The thing about angels and demons is, they were created without free will. Each of them has a job to do in God's Plan, and to contradict it is to go against the very nature of their existence. Of course, over six thousand years living among people, some of that free will starts to rub off. Aziraphale and Crowley reached a working friendship somewhere in history, to the point that one will do the other's job if they happen to be in the neighborhood. The decision to try and avert the Apocalypse is made by Crowley (being easier for him since demons are, by definition, rebels). Crowley then has to persuade Aziraphale to go along with it, pointing out the sheer insipidity of a world in which Heaven wins the Last Battle, but the point that gets him on board isn't a philosophical one. It's the lack of sushi. For an angel to actively attempt to subvert God's order is no small thing--just ask Lucifer. Conversely, Crowley's defiance of Hell's shot at checkmate consigns him to torments that the damned could look at and say "at least I'm not that guy."
Due to a breakdown in communication, the plan to give the new-born Antichrist to Satanist parents fails spectacularly. Because of this, the child is given the name Adam and raised in a pretty vanilla family--he has friends, gets into trouble (like any other boy, just with a bit more style), and ends up with a decidedly human outlook. It's important to note that the main reason Adam rejects his Antichrist tendencies is because of a "what have I done" moment that occurs when he imposes his will on his friends. He later explains to Beelzebub and the Metatron that he's not going to let the world end, since that wouldn't prove anything. He then proceeds to disallow Satan's appearance on Earth. In overcoming his birthright, Adam is able to override the next-best thing to a deity.
By having the main characters overcome their natures through exertion of their free will, Gaiman and Pratchett make a strong point: a person (or even an odd divine being) isn't shunted into certain actions just because "fate" says so.
Though one example is hardly enough to sway the opinions of those that turn up their nose at fantasy fiction, Good Omens is far from the only fantasy novel that deals with substantial issues. The genre, by virtue of being something other than an orgy of verisimilitude, is able to present important issues with just enough contextual baggage to thoroughly examine them.
Friday, December 17, 2010
Omens That Are Good
Well, I have to write this “essay” for my Fantasy Fiction course at SUNY Fredonia. My professor has allowed us free range over pretty much any topic and any text that has sparked our interest. *activate demonic voice distortion* MUAH HAH HAH. *deactivate demonic voice distortion* So, I love the book Good Omens by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman (or Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett...) and so should you. I would like to talk about its ranking on the awesomeness chart that I have installed in my brain, but I don’t think I could transfer the files to all of you (and Dr. Simon said that this needs to be “educational” or something). One of the questions brought up when Dr. Simon asked us what we wanted to take away from this class, at the beginning of the year, was whether or not we were really learning anything relevant by studying fantasy fiction.
So, are we really learning anything relevant by studying fantasy fiction? If you’re actually taking the time to read this, my guess is that you just set down some book with a dragon or wizard or demon or quaragathorp, or some other creature flying around some celestial body of planets or stars in a distant galaxy on the cover to read some nerdy dude’s fantasy blog, and I’m not going to have to do too much convincing in order to prove that, well, yes, yes we are. (Greatest thesis statement of my college career thus far--thank you, taxpayers of New York, for allowing me to do this.)
I’ve been starting to really see the connectivity of the world around us, and all the subjects that I’ve been studying, both in and out of the classroom. After reading (if you can actually call such an experience with such a book “reading”) Good Omens, the gears, or cogs, or hamsters, or whatever, of my brain were whirling. I was thinking mostly about the philosophical statement that Gaiman and Pratchett were making that when it comes down to it good and evil either don’t exist, or don’t really matter due to our ability to morally and logically weigh the implications of our actions. This, my friends, is what you would call “relevant.” It is relevant now, it was relevant when this book was published in 1990, it was relevant as soon as man “bit the apple” and will be relevant ‘til the day we blow ourselves up (or don’t blow ourselves up...). These men (you can substitute geniuses, or in the spirit of Pratchett, conjurers) are trying to convey to us the importance of...get ready for it...actually THINKING before we act. Now the irony in that statement due to the indulgences in their immortal characters could be a whole other essay, but I’ll spare you that. What Pratchett and Gaiman are telling us is that no matter what the extenuating circumstances are, no matter what outside influences may be trying to affect you, the only one responsible for your actions is yourself. Crowley just put the guns in the hands of the businessmen; it was their decision to use them that was evil, not Crowley’s outside influence (in fact his influence, that the bullets didn’t kill, would probably be considered good, *BUM bum BUM!*)
There’s also that whole free will thing. Interestingly enough, in Philosophy class the other month, prior to my Fantasy Fiction class’s discussion of Good Omens, we discussed the concept of “free will,” and discovered that in essence it contains two stipulations: a “will,” or a desire, drive, or motivation to do something, and “freedom,” the ability to act upon your will. Constantly throughout the novel central characters, (Crawley, Aziraphale, Adam) are forced to act against their will. None of them truly want the world to end, yet this is a story of the apocalypse, so for the first 360 or so pages, one starts to doubt that there is such a thing as free will; there will always be barriers, roadblocks, limitations, divine beings controlling your employment statuses threatening you with eternal torture, that will impede or exercise control over your willingness to do things. However at the end we are provided with some hope. Gaiman and Pratchett liberate these characters, suspend doom, and look towards a bright future of eating apples. This goes to show that there is such a thing as “free will,” within our grasp; all you have to do is break some rules, do some hard work, and pray that the Son of Satan is truly a sweetheart deep down inside.
Relevance! I hope that you came away with at least something from this brain diarrhea that has been cleverly disguised as a “response paper,” but if you have not yet, then I offer you this: read Good Omens. If you want a copy, send me an e-mail and you can borrow mine, I only ask one favor from you in return: think.
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
"Escaping" into Fantasy Fiction
Many people accuse the genre of fantasy fiction of being a means of escape. Because the worlds in fantasy novels are generally meant to be fantastical and so unlike our own, it is assumed that the people who read them are escaping into a more pleasant world. This is not always the case. After all, how can it be deemed "escaping" if the world that is laid out for the reader in a fantasy novel is intended to be worse than our own? What are we escaping into then? In actuality, fantasy novels use their fantastical elements to present real-life problems in an obvious way.
One thing that can be said about fantasy novels is that everything within them seems to be bigger and better. In a manner of speaking, anyway. For example, fantasy novels always seem to present two sides to any battle: the side of good and the side of evil. While this is certainly a parallel to everyday life, fantasy presents the two sides as polar opposites. Those who are going into battle on the side of good are capable of only doing good. Those who are on the side of evil are undeniably evil and more so than anything you would be able to imagine in the real world. Usually there is also a major character that is struggling with which side to choose, allowing the audience to have someone to identify with. Using such extremes allows the author to present the problems the world is facing in a much clearer way. When problems are blown up in this way, it becomes difficult to ignore even the most subtle metaphors.
The worlds of fantasy fiction are flawed. Sometimes even fatally so. This is why it's so hard to actually dismiss the genre as "escapist." One of the novels that helps illustrate this point is King's Blood Four by Sheri S. Tepper. In the world of the Lands of the True Game, the characters' lives become at risk the moment they leave school. They spend their entire lives training to exist outside of the school and they are only ever given two choices: train or be useless. Additionally, prior to entering the Lands of the True Game, their roles are assigned to them. Essentially, any choices that they have are limited or taken away from them. In what way would a person want to "escape" into this world?
On top of this, Tepper uses her world to show her audience some of the more pressing social issues that we have to deal with on a daily basis. In the school, we see that Peter is looked down upon because he is a "foundling" rather than a "sentling." This allows Tepper to deal with the very real class system that's still around, especially in schools, to this day. However, that's not to say that this example has to deal exclusively with class. In fact, one could substitute any modern social problem that we have in this world and the example would still work just as well.
J.R.R. Tolkien, one of the foremost authors in the fantasy genre, defends the claim that it cannot be viewed merely as escapist in his essay "On Fairy-Stories." Within the essay, Tolkien advocates that fantasy should not be considered escapist necessarily as oftentimes the work provides the reader with the ability to see their world through the perspective of another. Something that seems quite commonplace to us can be considered strange in a fantasy world, causing the reader to reevaluate the world in which we live. Additionally, Tolkien points out that an individual does not need fantasy to escape since they always have their own mind. He likens his point to a prisoner. The prisoner is not made to only think of his surroundings. Finally, Tolkien includes the point that some readers may seek works of fantasy as a consolation. The happy endings the authors offer up are more pleasing than the events in the readers' lives.
Fantasy as a genre is generally accused of being quite escapist. However, there are several arguments that can be used to refute this claim. Some fantasy worlds are actually worse than the one in which the reader resides. Fantasy is not necessarily the only means of escape. The reader can learn a life lesson through reading fantasy, as it offers them a different perspective on their own world. However, for as many arguments there are to refute the claim of escapism, every time a story has a happy ending the same claim will simply resurface.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Writing about Reality Is Boring
The reasons fantasy fiction is read depend upon the individual holding the book. The same can be said about the reasons writers choose the genre; it varies upon whose fingers are at the ready to create a story. While we can attribute the more prominent reason of pure enjoyment for readers to pick up that copy of The Lord of the Rings, we can truly ponder why the author would choose to write in this younger vein of literature. The following are some possibilities of why they made the choice they did, and why you may want to try your hand at it as well.
Maybe it's the simple enjoyment of writing fantasy fiction, as is very noticeable in A Spell for Chameleon, by Piers Anthony. This story is about a character searching for his magical talent in a world of pure magic, which can allow for all sorts of fun to be had if approached from the right mind set. Anthony was obviously looking to have some fun and hopefully make people laugh when he started writing about the world of Xanth. Throughout the story he creates all kinds of puns, some bad and some good, which become widely available for him in this world. We've all heard that phrase "to sow your wild oats," but Anthony takes it and creates it in a literal sense for the main character of the book, Bink. The character, at one point in his many moments of reflection, thinks back to when he was 15 and decided to "sow wild oats" in his backyard. Well, as it turns out, in the world of Xanth this is actually a method of creating an oat nymph that can handle a young man's hormonal impulses. In addition to this we read about vicious "nickelpedes," food supplying "breadloaf trees," and "pill bushes" that can help an injured traveler. To flex the muscles of imagination this approach of unbridled creativity--where the "logical" constrictions of our world become unhinged--may be an excellent start for any writer.
On the other hand, some authors go with writing fantasy fiction for the opportunity to just create a whole new, breathing world, such as is the case for J.R.R. Tolkien and his The Lord of the Rings trilogy. The nice thing about a place that is being spawned from the writer's imagination--opposed to non-fiction or other stories based solely within the reality we know--the author has free rein, at least to the extent that the events which occur do so within reason of the world within which they exist. Now, we may think, "But Anthony wrote some ridiculous elements in his stories that hardly seem reasonable"; however, Anthony was still consistent in his ridiculousness in creating a world that didn't contradict itself. While many fantasy fiction writers do create new worlds for their minds to play in, Tolkien was a true master in that he also ended up creating full histories about the world of Middle Earth. What becomes appealing to the reader is that for some this creates an opportunity to explore and/or escape from their own daily lives, among other personal reasons. This approach to writing may seem like a huge task, but it's a great way to build a great habit. The more you create in your mind about the history of a place or character in your story the more they will appear to be alive to your audience. With that backup knowledge about the who's and the what's, as an author, you’ll be more intuitive about interactions that involve those characters and places.
Over the years multiple writers have used literature to make socio/political commentary. With fantasy fiction, an author can reach audiences that might not readily approach the issues they wish to convey if they were presented in another form. One such case is the book by Anne McCaffrey, Dragonsong. This book takes place on a planet that came to be inhabited countless years ago by ancestors that had the technology to accomplish interplanetary travel--technology which has, at this point, been long gone. McCaffrey tells the story of a young woman named Menolly on the planet Pern. In this world there are individuals that are called Harpers, bard-like instructors that hand down collective knowledge to each hold's (like towns) citizens--instructions like history, or how to farm or fish, and so on. Menolly is one such individual who is more than capable of accomplishing this task for the hold that she lives in. The problem is that within her hold this position has always been traditionally held by men. So as a result she gets mistreated in numerous ways to keep her from bringing "shame" to her father, the leader of the community, through breaking this tradition. The way the story is told has the effect of being a feminist statement in support of that movement in the '70s when Dragonsong was written. Instead of writing direct arguments about the inequality woman faced, McCaffrey took a side approach to bring awareness to all kinds of individuals, including younger readers. Today it would seem there are even more issues that need to be contended with, but they might not always get the attention from the masses they deserve. Maybe there is an issue you feel passionate about that isn't quite as recognized as you would wish; why not try using fantasy fiction as a means of clueing in more people about the problem?
Then there are books that take comedy, commentary, and creative freedom and roll them all up together. Good Omens, by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett, aims to be creatively hilarious, which it accomplishes perfectly, and ends up having some interesting things to say about us humans that can momentarily sober up the comedy--mind you, only momentarily. This story is about The Armageddon, the forces of heaven and hell, a devil and an angel joining forces to stop it, and a host of other characters. When the antichrist is supposed to be an 11-year-old child with the power to recreate the world in his image, the world would never expect what he dreams up. Everything from Tibetans digging tunnels through the earth and popping up in people's yards to space aliens that come to deliver "a message of universal peace and cosmic harmony an' suchlike" (205) but not knowing why they were told to bring the message makes for a very entertaining read. The commentaries on humanity and the world, aside from the major one that pokes fun at religious Armageddon, are slipped in almost without notice. After aliens give a "message" to a confused character they then act like intergalactic police and say to the character, after taking a CO2 reading that seems to be too high, "you do know you could find yourself charged with being a dominant species while under the influence of impulse-driven consumerism, don't you?" (205); in this moment some readers might find themselves stopping their laughter and seriously pondering the way we live our lives. There are many spots in the book that have this effect, but it's only a matter of lines before you again find yourself laughing out loud.
For each of these books and authors, the reasons I speculate on why they wrote those stories are only one in what I'm sure were a dozen reasons they chose fantasy fiction as the genre to express their creativity. Whatever their reasons, they obviously enjoyed it. So if you're thinking of taking up the pen, why not give your imagination a good exercise and spin a tale through the lens of fantasy fiction?
Works Cited
Anthony, Piers. A Spell for Chameleon: The First Xanth Novel. New York: Ballantine, 1977. Print.
Gaiman, Neil and Pratchett, Terry. Good Omens. New York: HarperTorch, 1990. Print.
McCaffrey, Anne. Dragonsong. New York: Aladdin Paperbacks, 2003. Print.
Tolkien, J. R. R. The Hobbit, Or, There and Back Again. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966. Print.
Monday, November 29, 2010
A Different Perspective
Why do authors choose to write in fantasy, anyways? Why pick a genre that is generally shrugged off by literature professors as they turn their noses to the canon? Talented writers are spending years upon years and sometimes their whole lives wrapped up in imaginary worlds. Are they wasting their time? An even more important question: are we wasting our time when we read fantasy? We could be flipping pages in War and Peace instead, or pondering Wordsworth on a picnic bench by an Adirondack lake, sniffing in the sweet fall air as geese fly in their ardent “V” overhead (no doubt dropping some fragrant gifts from the sky) and honk farewell as they disappear into a hazy dusk. Excuse me, I digress. Why would a fantasy writer waste their time twiddling their thumbs in imaginary worlds when they could have that beautiful scene by the lake? (Maybe because when he was reading poetry by the lake, he realized that there were very intricate carvings in the varnished wood. As he traced these etchings with his forefinger, a faint light seemed to appear deep inside each foreign character. The sound of upset lake water pricked his ears and when he looked up a very large boat was emerging from under the water, with the same carvings all along the stern. A centaur beckoned to him.) We can't precisely address this question without having an interview with the writer himself or herself but can we, and should we, try to pry into the author's choice to write in fantasy? It is hard enough to infer the intention of a single work and much more confusing to find an intent in genre choice. Yet, it is still an interesting endeavor to wonder about the ideas and convictions that give inspiration to fantasy writers. Contemplating this will supply us with insight as readers in the world of fantasy fiction.
Let's take the work of Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman. Good Omens is no run-of-the-mill fantasy book by any means. Located in our modern world, we have angels and demons, men and witches, the natural and the supernatural all stuck in the apocalypse. They supply us with all the humor and entertainment we could ever want in this work of genius. Yet, for some reason these authors chose to deliver their impeccable style in fantasy when they could have easily written in another (more respected) genre. They chose this perspective with a specific intention. When working in fantasy, an author can use non-human characters and unrealistic worlds to say certain things about humanity, society, and our current condition. An angel and a demon can casually observe humanity like no human could. For instance Crowley (the demon) thinks, "It may help to understand human affairs to be clear that most of the great triumphs and tragedies of history are caused, not by people being fundamentally good or fundamentally bad, but by people being fundamentally people" (26). This message runs throughout the book, the erasing of the line between good and evil. There is something quite shocking about these ideas coming from angels and demons who are supposed to define the two different sides of the spectrum. One would expect a modern-day contemporary thinker to say something about the disappearance of good and evil. But a demon destroying these boundaries is preposterous, and effective. Crowley asks Aziraphale, "Well, haven't you ever wondered about it all? You know--your people and my people, Heaven and Hell, good and evil, all that sort of thing? I mean, why?" (360). Rules are broken and angels and demons wonder about the same things that humans do. Pratchett and Gaiman demonstrate the same "ineffable" feelings that humans experience from another view.
Another composer of fantasy, Piers Anthony, has a much different take on the genre. He has created the world of Xanth, with its own type of magic and plenty of flora and fauna to accompany it. In this world, Anthony tells us many things about humanity. The character Bink is a philosophizing exile, who in the end discovers some things about himself and other people. His whole journey is filled with him gaining new knowledge, information that he is not necessarily supposed to have. He is on a quest that leads him to truth. Nonetheless, Anthony makes Bink a very stubborn and dogmatic character. The reader can see the truth before Bink does--his stubbornness is often cumbersome. Isn't this how we view ourselves after coming to a sudden realization and point of change? Bink may represent humans in general with his slow-changing views of how the world works. It takes him so long to see the truth about Trent because he was taught that Trent is evil. Is this much different than our own mundanian human nature? We hold onto our own comfortable views of the world and the older we get the less willing we are to change. Our society is full of Bink-like people. It is easy to see this reality of human dogmatism (and other philosophies) that Anthony presents through his fantastical world. We may look on the ignorance of the Xanthians with harsh judgement. We should turn this judgement on ourselves. Anthony is saying these things in a different approach; through fantasy he delivers his message with greater ease.
The intent of fantasy writers is very similar to the intent of writers in any genre. Literature gives us insight into life and fantasy fiction is not left out of this statement. Writers of this genre may have chosen it because of their fascination with the mystical or they may have been tired with reality that they faced day to day. But fantasy fiction should not be viewed as an escape from our everyday life. We should not just want to escape into alternate realities that entertain us and delay our problems for a while. I do not think that is the reason authors choose fantasy. Their statements on the human condition come naturally and powerfully through this genre and take on a new and distinct perspective. These stories carry the essential component of good art (that ever escaping, shifting, always there, always departing human condition) and can hold their own weight against other forms of literature. Fantasy fiction is an important aspect to lives of many people and that will not change. This brings us to the conclusion...long live fantasy!
Works Cited
Anthony, Piers. A Spell for Chameleon. New York: Del Rey, 1977.
Gaiman, Neil, and Terry Pratchett. Good Omens: The Nice and Accurate Prophecies of Agnes Nutter, Witch. New York: Harper, 2007